"De viktigste gevinstene vi ser er utsatt behov og redusert antall besøk fra hjemmetjenester, utsatt behov for institusjonsplass, økt trygghet, frihet, mestring og selvstendighet for brukere og pårørende, redusert belastning for tjenesten og mindre bruk av tvang."
- User (Larvik municipality, 2016)We are facing a double demographic challenge. The ageing population’s need for health and care services is increasing, while access to the workforce is declining.
Digitalisation can be increasingly important for enabling municipalities to offer quality health and care services.
Digital supervision can consist of various sensors such as a sensor sheet that detects when a person is absent from bed, motion sensors in motion detection rooms, door alarms that issue an alert when they are passed and fall detectors that detect abrupt movements.
Services with sensor technology are often included in so-called security packages in which alerts/alarms/signals are sent to the service or the municipality's response service. These can also be combined with a camera for image transfer so that the response service can log on at the agreed time or image transfer can be activated in the event that an alarm is triggered, resulting in the required measures.
The Norwegian National Programme for Personal Connected Health and Care has recommended that this service is implemented nationally. This recommendation is based on the benefits from the development phase of this service.
To ensure service volume, an important task is standardisation in order to ensure that personal connected health and care is implemented in Norway on the basis of internationally accredited standards.
Other essential prerequisites to be solved to ensure the volume and success of this kind of service include good systems for the response service, procurement practice, integration of patient record systems, changes in mindset and, most of all, solutions that meet the users’ needs.
The Norwegian Directorate of Health, together with the Norwegian Association of Local and Regional Authorities (KS) and the Norwegian Directorate for eHealth run the National Programme for Personal Connected Health and Care (NVP). The overall goal of this programme is to ensure that personal connected health and care becomes an integral part of health and care services by 2020. The objective is to meet the municipalities' information and knowledge needs in order to facilitate broad use of welfare technology solutions.
From 2013 to 2016, 31 municipalities were included as development municipalities in the programme. Currently, in the escalation phase, 80% of the municipalities in Norway are engaged in the programme. The NVP is providing a wide range of implementation tools and support to the municipalities engaged in the programme. The tools and support offered by the programme comprise:
Since 2013, digital supervision or various individual sensors have been tried out in the Lister region, Østre-Agder, the Værnes region, Vestre Toten, the southern counties, Bergen, Tromsø, Skien, Stord, Larvik and Lindås municipalities. From the early trial period until the present time, the municipalities appear to have gained increasing benefits. The service seems to be particularly relevant to people with cognitive impairment in order to prevent them from “walking” at night, in both an institutional-based care and a home-based services setting, as well as reducing the need for one-man staffing in the habilitation service.
The price varies depending on the specific technology chosen. Cost-saving estimates have been made in some of the development municipalities. These are described under "More about effects".
Different municipalities will have a different potential for savings.
In the development phase of this service, 34 municipalities were nominated as development municipalities.
Currently, 80% of the municipalities in Norway are included in activities that are supported by the National Programme for Personal Connected Health and Care.
In order to scale the solutions in operation, in 2016 the development municipalities worked systematically on acquiring technology solutions, organizing the reception of alerts and implementing good routines for training, follow-up and adaptation of technology solutions.
The municipalities have also worked systematically on profit planning, as well as identifying good measurement indicators for welfare technology, evaluation and documentation.
From 2017, the NVP programme entered the dissemination and escalation phase. The transition to operational phase can be critical. For some municipalities, the transition will be greater than for other municipalities as they have chosen different ways of implementing the new services. Some municipalities have chosen to utilise the technology solutions and set up the organization, adapted and further developed the service as more service recipients arrived. Others have chosen to set up and prepare the service for a high number of users before deploying the technology, which has required a lot of advance work. Regardless of which approach the municipalities have chosen, it is important that the transition to ordinary operations is considered early in the process.
The documented effects of the trials in the municipalities that participated in the development phase have been summarized in in the First and Second Benefit Realization Reports with recommendations (Norwegian Directorate of Health, 2016 and 2017).
Do you want to know more about the solution?
In the development phase of the national programme, the municipalities have worked systematically on project management, service development, evaluation and documentation work, gaining expertise and general knowledge of personal connected health and care/welfare technology. These municipalities now have valuable expertise regarding opportunities and utility for end users, their relatives and the service as a whole.
If you want to know more about the solution, visit:
The NVP programme in Norway emphasises s the realization of the effects, depending on the context and the individual municipality's service. Different municipalities will have a different potential for savings and the benefits in one municipality will not be transferable to another municipality utilising the same technology. This relates to how health and care services are organized, as well as resources and demographics. Every municipality must identify its own potential to deliver better and more efficient services.
If you want to succeed in introducing welfare technology, the municipality must succeed in changing the way services are delivered. Welfare technology must also be seen in the context of other user-oriented services such as everyday exercise and everyday rehabilitation, where relevant (health and the Ministry of Care, 2015). It appears that the municipalities that adapt the technology to their existing service have the greatest potential of gaining major benefits from welfare technology.